BMJ 1999;319:376-379 ( 7 August )

Education and debate

Methods in health service research

Evaluation of health interventions at area and organisation level

This is the second of four articles

Obioha C Ukoumunne, research associate a Martin C Gulliford, senior lecturer a Susan Chinn, reader a Jonathan A C Sterne, senior lecturer a Peter G J Burney, professor a Allan Donner, chairman b

a Department of Public Health Sciences, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's School of Medicine, King's College, London SE1 3QD, b Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C1 Edited by Nick Black

Correspondence to: MC Gulliford martin.gulliford@kcl.ac.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Healthcare interventions are often implemented at the level of the organisation or geographical area rather than at the level of the individual patient or healthy subject. For example, screening programmes are delivered to residents of a particular area; health promotion interventions might be delivered to towns or schools; general practitioners deliver services to general practice populations; hospital specialists deliver health care to clinic populations. Interventions at area or organisation level are delivered to clusters of individuals.

The evaluation of interventions based in an area or organisation may require the allocation of clusters of individuals to different intervention groups (see box 1). 1 2 Cluster based evaluations present special problems both in design and analysis.3 Often only a small number of organisational units of large size are available for study, and the investigator needs to consider the most effective way of designing a study with this constraint. Outcomes may be evaluated either . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Community involvement in dengue vector control: cluster randomised trial
V Vanlerberghe, M E Toledo, M Rodríguez, D Gomez, A Baly, J R Benitez, and P Van der Stuyft
BMJ 2009 338: b1959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Related external webpages:

NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Bottaro, S. M., Giugliani, E. R. J. (2009). Effectiveness of an Intervention to Improve Breastfeeding Knowledge and Attitudes Among Fifth-grade Children in Brazil. J Hum Lact 25: 325-332 [Abstract]  
  • Fiks, A. G., Hunter, K. F., Localio, A. R., Grundmeier, R. W., Bryant-Stephens, T., Luberti, A. A., Bell, L. M., Alessandrini, E. A. (2009). Impact of Electronic Health Record-Based Alerts on Influenza Vaccination for Children With Asthma. Pediatrics 124: 159-169 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Vanlerberghe, V, Toledo, M E, Rodriguez, M, Gomez, D, Baly, A, Benitez, J R, Van der Stuyft, P (2009). Community involvement in dengue vector control: cluster randomised trial. BMJ 338: b1959-b1959 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kunz, R, Wegscheider, K, Guyatt, G, Zielinski, W, Rakowsky, N, Donner-Banzhoff, N, Muller-Lissner, S (2007). Impact of short evidence summaries in discharge letters on adherence of practitioners to discharge medication. A cluster-randomised controlled trial. Qual Saf Health Care 16: 456-461 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Barlow, G., Nathwani, D., Williams, F., Ogston, S., Winter, J., Jones, M., Slane, P., Myers, E., Sullivan, F., Stevens, N., Duffey, R., Lowden, K., Davey, P. (2007). Reducing door-to-antibiotic time in community-acquired pneumonia: controlled before-and-after evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis. Thorax 62: 67-74 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Vostanis, P., Anderson, L., Window, S. (2006). Evaluation of a Family Support Service: Short-term Outcome. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 11: 513-528 [Abstract]  
  • GILBODY, S., BOWER, P., WHITTY, P. (2006). Costs and consequences of enhanced primary care for depression: Systematic review of randomised economic evaluations. Br. J. Psychiatry 189: 297-308 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bravo, G., Dubois, M.-F., Roy, P.-M. (2005). Using goal attainment scaling to improve the quality of long-term care: a group-randomized trial. Int J Qual Health Care 17: 511-519 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Sur, D, Deen, J L, Manna, B, Niyogi, S K, Deb, A K, Kanungo, S, Sarkar, B L, Kim, D R, Danovaro-Holliday, M C, Holliday, K, Gupta, V K, Ali, M, von Seidlein, L, Clemens, J D, Bhattacharya, S K (2005). The burden of cholera in the slums of Kolkata, India: data from a prospective, community based study. Arch. Dis. Child. 90: 1175-1181 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Jokhio, A. H., Winter, H. R., Cheng, K. K. (2005). An Intervention Involving Traditional Birth Attendants and Perinatal and Maternal Mortality in Pakistan. NEJM 352: 2091-2099 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Buekens, P., Keusch, G., Belizan, J., Bhutta, Z. A. (2004). Evidence-Based Global Health. JAMA 291: 2639-2641 [Full text]  
  • Gandjour, A., Neumann, I., Lauterbach, K. W. (2003). Appropriateness of invasive cardiovascular interventions in German hospitals (2000-2001): an evaluation using the RAND appropriateness criteria. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 24: 571-577 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kendrick, D, Royal, S (2003). Inequalities in cycle helmet use: cross sectional survey in schools in deprived areas of Nottingham. Arch. Dis. Child. 88: 876-880 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Holloway, F. (2002). Commentary: putting mental health services research on the map. Psychiatr. Bull. 26: 409-410 [Full text]  
  • Kroeger, A., Avila, E. V., Morison, L. (2002). Insecticide impregnated curtains to control domestic transmission of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Venezuela: cluster randomised trial. BMJ 325: 810-813 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Chuang, J.-H., Hripcsak, G., Heitjan, D. F. (2002). Design and Analysis of Controlled Trials in Naturally Clustered Environments: Implications for Medical Informatics. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 9: 230-238 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • King, M., Davidson, O., Taylor, F., Haines, A., Sharp, D., Turner, R. (2002). Effectiveness of teaching general practitioners skills in brief cognitive behaviour therapy to treat patients with depression: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 324: 947-947 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Jordhuy, M S, Fayers, P M, Ahlner-Elmqvist, M, Kaasa, S (2002). Lack of concealment may lead to selection bias in cluster randomized trials of palliative care. Palliat Med 16: 43-49 [Abstract]  
  • Hastings, G., Stead, M., MacKintosh, A. M. (2002). Rethinking drugs prevention: Radical thoughts from social marketing. Health Education Journal 61: 347-364 [Abstract]  
  • GILBODY, S., WHITTY, P. (2002). Improving the delivery and organisation of mental health services: beyond the conventional randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Psychiatry 180: 13-18 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Jordhoy, M. S., Fayers, P., Loge, J. H., Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., Kaasa, S. (2001). Quality of Life in Palliative Cancer Care: Results From a Cluster Randomized Trial. JCO 19: 3884-3894 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Localio, A. R., Berlin, J. A., Ten Have, T. R., Kimmel, S. E. (2001). Adjustments for Center in Multicenter Studies: An Overview. ANN INTERN MED 135: 112-123 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Salisbury, C., Bosanquet, N. (2000). Assessing palliative care is difficult. BMJ 320: 942-942 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ