Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
General practitioners in study seemed to agree with commentary writer
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Kessler et al assessed the ability of general practitioners to
diagnose depression and anxiety as defined by the general health
questionnaire (GHQ-12).1 Unfortunately, they have
miscalculated their results; from their data, the general practitioners
had a sensitivity of 36% and a specificity of 91%.
These figures suggest that the participating general
practitioners
at least in their day to day practice
shared Heath's
opinion in her commentary.1 Most patients with a score >3
on the general health questionnaire do not have a diagnosable
psychiatric condition.
| 1. |
Kessler D, Lloyd K, Lewis G, Gray DP.
Cross sectional study of symptom attribution and recognition of depression and anxiety in primary care [with commentary by I Heath].
BMJ
1999;
318:
436-440 |
Authors' reply
EDITOR
Our paper had a hostile commentary from Heath. She ignored the
substance of what we were saying about the importance of patients'
attributional styles and criticised the use of the general health
questionnaire1 as a screening instrument for depression
and anxiety in general practice. Johnstone and Talbot have little to
add to Heath's criticisms.2 Like her, they ignore the
main body of