BMJ 1999;319:189 ( 17 July )

Letters

Effect of discussion and deliberation on public's views of priority setting

    More data are needed for readers to make judgment about study
    Authors' reply

More data are needed for readers to make judgment about study

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Dolan et al conclude that people's views on setting priorities differ systematically when they have been given the opportunity to discuss and deliberate, yet they present data that show the stability of the public's opinions.1 After discussion more than half of the respondents (52%) did not change their minds about who should be involved in priority setting. A further 40% shifted only one point on a five-point scale, which was aggregated to three points, suggesting that the scale discriminated poorly between different preferences. When the participants considered which groups should be proritised 63% did not change their minds and, overall, only two groups were prioritised differently the second time.

The assumption that respondents to questionnaire surveys fail to consider their replies carefully underlies this study, though we are not aware of any evidence to support this. The authors also present no data to support the implication that the . . . [Full text of this article]
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study
Paul Dolan, Richard Cookson, and Brian Ferguson
BMJ 1999 318: 916-919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ