Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Rahi et al's data enable the annual incidence of congenital
cataracts in the United Kingdom to be estimated.1 The incidence is roughly 3 per 10 000 live births after allowance is made
for their assessment of the non-completeness of the data. This rarity
does not make the condition unimportant but does raise considerable
difficulties for a screening programme. This is especially so when the
apparently simple screening test relies on the interpretation of a
clinical sign that is difficult to elicit from many infants in the
circumstances in which the test is usually performed.
The challenge for clinicians is to retain high sensitivity for
detecting the abnormality without unduly reducing the specificity. In
addition, they must resist the inevitable pressure to reduce their
sensitivity in the light of the large number of false positive results
they detect. To put this in perspective, only one in every 180 infants
referred for further