Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
is there an economic case?
Declan Gaffney a Health Policy
and Health Services Research Unit, School of Public Policy, University
College London, London WC1H 9EZ, b Social Welfare Research Unit, University of Northumbria,
Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, c Department of Accounting, University of Manchester,
Manchester M13 9PL
Correspondence to: Allyson Pollock
allyson.pollock@ucl.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The private finance initiative substantially increases the cost of hospital building. Total costs (construction costs plus financing costs) in a sample of hospitals built under the private finance initiative are 18-60% higher than construction costs alone (table 1). Shareholders in private finance initiative schemes can expect real returns of 15-25% a year.1 The consortiums involved in these schemes charge the NHS fees equivalent to 11.2-18.5% of construction costs (table 2). If the Treasury were to finance new hospitals directly out of its own borrowing it would pay a real rate of annual interest of 3.0-3.5%. It has been estimated that the £2.7 billion Scottish private finance initiative programme will cost, at a conservative estimate, "£2 billion more than if the Treasury had acquired the assets directly."2 The higher costs will be met locally through cuts in clinical spending and nationally through subsidies from NHS capital budgets.
Medical staff
Read all Rapid Responses