Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Bisset suggests that magnetic resonance imaging might
be an alternative to necropsy.1 The first public
presentation of work specifically assessing the use of magnetic
resonance imaging as an alternative to necropsy was given by two of
us (JASB, WRL) in 1995 (abstract presented at Radiological Society of
North America's scientific programme, Chicago, 1995). The first peer
reviewed publication of this work appeared in 1996.2
Further developmental work continues at University College London
Hospital, London,3 and has been reported at several meetings.
Magnetic resonance necropsy is now offered as an established
service in the imaging department of this hospital. At a time when
rates of necropsy not requested by a coroner have fallen to less than
10% for adults and about 50% for infants who die in the perinatal
period (the most prognostically important age group for necropsy)
magnetic resonance imaging offers an acceptable alternative.4 Imaging diagnosis has become the