Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Standardised instruments are needed to guide the measurement of competence
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Fazel et al described an instrument for the assessment of
competency to complete advance directives that seems to be reliable,
valid, and ready for use in clinical practice.1 We believe, however, that certain aspects require clarification before the
clinical usefulness of the test is assured.
Firstly, who is this test meant for? Different groups are suggested in different parts of the text. Is it meant to differentiate between competency and incompetency in demented patients, in the broader group of patient with cognitive impairment, or in elderly volunteers? If the test aims to assess competency in dementia, test-retest analysis should include only data on demented patients, because fluctuations in functioning in this group are more common. The reported test-retest correlation was mainly based on data on non-demented subjects, and there is a likelihood of overestimation of the reliability of the test for demented subjects.
The test discriminated between non-demented