Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Is assumption of no association between smoking and other causes of death valid?
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Liu et al used the term "proportional mortality study" to
describe their method of comparing the smoking habits of 0.7 million
adults who died of neoplastic, respiratory, or vascular causes with
those of a reference group of 0.2 million who died of other causes in
China.1 The term can be confusing as it is used only for
proportional mortality ratio analysis in standard epidemiology
textbooks.2 We suggest that the study can be more easily
understood if it is described as a case-control mortality study.
An important assumption in such analyses is that the other causes of
death should be unrelated to the exposure "not only in the sense of
causation but also in terms of `self-selection' for the exposure and
the diagnosis and certification of the underlying cause of
death."3 Liu et al validated this assumption by showing that the smoking rates of the male and female reference groups were