Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Format as well as content matters in clinical information
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The function of information is to help us make
better decisions.1 The amount of clinical information,
measured by journal articles, has doubled over two
decades,2 but thanks to evidence based approaches the
content now seems more reliable. For example, the review article has
changed from a vehicle to advance the author's reputation3 to a balanced synthesis of evidence we can
safely use to inform clinical and policy decisions.4 To
justify this special position, much effort is expended on assembling
reliable content
from comprehensive literature searches4
to peer review and the editorial process.5 However, just
assembling the right words and data is not enough to ensure that better
decisions will be taken. Elting's study in this issue shows that
doctors' decisions can easily be manipulated by changing the format of
words and data
for example, by presenting information in tables,
graphs, or pictograms (p 1527).6 What is more, the
formats