Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Study broke hallowed tradition among fly fishers
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
The authors of the CRACKPOT study in evidence based trout
fishing are to be congratulated on a study protocol that broke the
hallowed tradition of competitiveness and individualism among fly
fishers.1 However, the study's design omitted two major
considerations: the time scale used and the character of the respondents.
Firstly, within what random periods did the 125 angling hours take
place within the 3696 (5 months × 24) available to them in the
season? The relative values of a Gold Ribbed Hare's Ear and a Cinnamon
Sedge, if transposed between a May morning and a September dusk, could
give very different results. Secondly, the artificially reared Kennet
trout in what is mainly a "put and take" fishery will have had
little exposure in their nursery to natural examples of ephemeroptera
on which replicas are based. Selection from CRACKPOT's limited trial
range will have had relatively little significance to trout conducting
their own early