Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
More benefit may arise from the assessments they necessitate
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The development of effective treatments for Alzheimer's disease has been vigorously pursued over the past few decades. Most recent developments have focused on drugs which inhibit acetylcholinesterase and thus increase the availability of acetylcholine within the brain. In this week's issue a pivotal clinical trial of rivastigmine shows, on average, modest benefits for older people with Alzheimer's disease in cognition, clinical global assessment, and quality of life (as assessed by a carer) (p 633).1 What does this add to the evidence for these cholinergic treatments?
The evidence to date is that treatments based on the cholinergic
hypothesis are essentially symptomatic. No substantial data support the
hypothesis that these medications modify the disease
that is, delay
its progression. The first drug in this class to show a beneficial
effect was tacrine. An early report of dramatic clinical response2 was not confirmed, and documented
hepatotoxicity3 severely curtailed its use. More recently
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.