Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Paul G Shekelle a West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical
Center (111G), 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA, b Department of Family Practice, Virginia Commonwealth
University, Fairfax, Virginia 22033, USA, c Centre For
Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle
upon Tyne NE2 4AA, d Health Services
Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB9 2ZD
Correspondence to: Dr Shekelle
shekelle@rand.org
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The methods of guideline development should ensure that treating patients according to the guidelines will achieve the outcomes that are desired. This article presents a combination of the literature about guideline development and the results of our combined experience in guideline development in North America and Britain. It considers the five steps in the initial development of an evidence based guideline. The dissemination, implementation, and evaluation of practice guidelines will be discussed in the final article in this series.1
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
| |
Identifying and refining the subject area of a guideline |
|---|
Prioritising topics
Guidelines can be developed for a wide range of subjects. Clinical
areas can be concerned with conditions (abnormal uterine bleeding,
coronary artery disease) or procedures (hysterectomy, coronary artery
bypass surgery). Given the large number of potential areas, some
priority setting is needed to select an area for guideline development.
Potential areas can emerge from an assessment of the major causes of
morbidity and mortality for a given population, uncertainty