Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Effect of a given concentration depends on several factors
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
In his editorial Rosengren considers that reaching target
cholesterol concentrations may be better than relative
reductions.1 He stated that "in observational studies a
prolonged difference in usual serum cholesterol value of 0.06 mmol/l
is associated with an almost 30% reduction in risk of coronary disease."
No one would question the need for reducing serum cholesterol concentration in large proportions of adults in Western populations. However, the subject of cholesterol concentration and its pathological importance is complex.
Known risk factors for coronary heart disease, of which serum
cholesterol concentration is one, explain only half of the variance in
the occurrence of the disease.2 There are also numerous contextual problems. For example, in the Sheffield risk table, cholesterol reduction may be called for at 5.5 mmol/l in those at high
risk, whereas intervention may not be needed until 9.0 mmol/l in those
at low risk.3 The experience of coronary heart disease
also