Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Meta-analysis has affected use of albumin
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
With the recent Cochrane Injuries Group meta-analysis
regarding albumin1 and subsequent correspondence in mind, we undertook a postal survey of paediatric departments in the South
East Thames region. We asked clinicians which fluid (crystalloid, albumin, or other colloid) would be used in a variety of scenarios, before and after 25 July 1998, in light of the meta-analysis. Altogether 12 of 13 departments replied, which equals a 92% response rate (table).
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
We found that all 12 would use crystalloid for 5% dehydration after
gastroenteritis, both before and after 25 July. Crystalloids are
favoured over "other colloids" for all indications. Recent publications have influenced routine clinical practice, reducing clinicians' willingness to use albumin, but most departments have not
made changes. Only in trauma resuscitation has there been a substantial
shift away from albumin to crystalloid, and in meningococcal disease
clinicians are still regularly using albumin. This suggests that
published reservations2 regarding the meta-analysis are borne out