Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Angela Coulter a King's Fund, London W1M 0AN, b Health Services Research Unit,
University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD
Correspondence to:
Dr Coulter acoulter@kehf.org.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Shared decision making, in which patients and health professionals join in both the process of decision making and ownership of the decision made, is attracting considerable interest as a means by which patients' preferences can be incorporated into clinical decisions.1 When there are several treatment options which may have different effects on the patient's quality of life, there is a strong case for offering patients choice. Their active involvement in decision making may increase the effectiveness of the treatment.
Trials are currently under way to test this hypothesis formally,
but there are good grounds for optimism. Patients with hypertension benefit if they are allowed to adopt an active rather than a passive role in treatment,
2 3
patients with breast cancer suffer less depression and anxiety if they are treated by doctors who adopt a
participative consultation style,4 and patients who are
more actively involved in discussions about the management of their