Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
If it leads to a proper debate about rationing the decision on sildenafil will not be entirely bad
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The recent decision of the secretary of state concerning how sildenafil (Viagra) will be made available within the National Health Service1 will have angered most men with erectile dysfunction and has caused grave disquiet among doctors.2 In dressing up a rationing decision as a clinical one, the secretary of state has ended up with the worst of all possible worlds: a decision that makes no sense on clinical, equity, or cost effectiveness grounds and has alienated communities that need to be engaged if rationing is to be acceptable.
Sildenafil was licensed for use in the United Kingdom on 15 September
1998. The previous day the NHS Executive issued guidance about the
drug, stating that ministers would be considering the evidence and
drawing up substantive policy proposals within the next few weeks; as
an interim measure, the Standing Medical Advisory Committee had advised
that doctors should not prescribe sildenafil.3 At that
time most
Read all Rapid Responses