Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Fallon suggests emphasising custody, but psychiatrists' future role remains unclear
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The diagnostic boundaries and treatability of
personality disorders have always been medically controversial. Whether
offenders with antisocial1 or dissocial2
personality disorder
"a most elusive category [with] wavering
confines"3
should be treated in hospital or punished in
prison is profoundly controversial. Now, because of highly publicised
cases of paedophilic violent offenders released from prison and the
case of Michael Stone, a convicted psychopathic murderer, the medical
response to personality disorder has become a subject of national
political debate. The dispute between the home secretary4
and the president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists5
about whether psychiatrists should be preventively detaining
untreatable psychopaths under the Mental Health Act illustrates well
the field of political conflict.
Into this debate comes the Fallon inquiry into the personality disorder
unit at Ashworth high security hospital.6 This will soon
be followed by the announcement of government policy on future services
and legal provisions for personality disordered
Read all Rapid Responses