BMJ 1999;318:56 ( 2 January )

Letters

Meta-analyses of observational data should be done with due care

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---In our review of meta-analyses of observational studies we pointed out that all these are susceptible to all the biases inherent in observational research1 and that it is easy to generate seemingly plausible explanations for findings of observational studies that are in fact spurious.2 Birkett's critique of one of our examples illustrates these points.3

Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)

Cappuccio et al showed a weak inverse association between calcium intake and blood pressure.4 Stratified analysis showed that the studies in which food frequency questionnaires were used showed a much greater association than the studies in which diet history or 24 hour dietary recall were used (figure, top). Cappuccio et al argued that this could be expected since food frequency questionnaires assess habitual diet and long term calcium intake was likely to be the important factor influencing blood pressure.

Birkett showed that for one study included in the meta-analysis standardised regression coefficients (the difference in . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Author defends meta-analysis that was criticised
Francesco P Cappuccio
BMJ 1999 319: 256. [Extract] [Full Text]

Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies
Matthias Egger, Martin Schneider, and George Davey Smith
BMJ 1998 316: 140-144. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wyatt, J, Guly, H (2002). Identifying the research question and planning the project. Emerg. Med. J. 19: 318-321 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lux, A. L, Edwards, S. W, Osborne, J. P, Hancock, E., Johnson, A. L, Kennedy, C. R, O'Callaghan, F. J K, Newton, R. W, Verity, C. M, Vigabatrin Paediatric Advisory Group, (2001). Revised guideline for prescribing vigabatrin in children. BMJ 322: 236-236 [Full text]  
  • Cappuccio, F. P (1999). Author defends meta-analysis that was criticised. BMJ 319: 256b-256 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Misleading inaccuracies do more harm than good
F P Cappuccio
bmj.com, 13 Jan 1999 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ