BMJ 1998;317:1659 ( 12 December )

Letters

The Bristol affair

    Surgeons were treated unjustly
    GMC clarifies readers' misunderstandings

Surgeons were treated unjustly

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---James Garrett claims credit for exposing "the medical scandal of the century"1 and accuses me of wishing to shoot the messenger.2 He may come to regret this claim for there is a growing perception that the actual scandal lies in the unjust way in which the surgeons have been treated.

Garrett believes that he reported the case fairly in his Dispatches programme and in the many documentaries that followed. But how often did he report the fact that the 50 or so patients subject to the General Medical Council's inquiry represented less than 4% of the surgeon's paediatric practice in 1990-5? Did he report that a disproportionate number of the infants under scrutiny were at particularly high risk? Has he reported the president's tribute to the surgeons' commitment, hard work, and best of intentions or the legal assessor's statement that they were of unimpeachable character? Has he given publicity . . . [Full text of this article]
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease
R E Ferner and Hugh J N Bethell
BMJ 1998 317: 1592. [Extract] [Full Text]

The Bristol affair
James Garrett, Wendy Savage, and Robyn Cain
BMJ 1998 317: 1592. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

The Bristol affair: advice of the Legal Assessor
Peter M Dunn
bmj.com, 29 Dec 1998 [Full text]
The Bristol affair: more questions
Wendy Savage
bmj.com, 5 Jan 1999 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ