Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
"Dispatches" programme was painstakingly researched and did not attract writ for defamation
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
It was my programme in March 1996 about the Bristol heart
surgery tragedy, for Channel 4's current affairs series
Dispatches, that prompted the General Medical Council
(GMC) to investigate what, it subsequently became clear, was the
medical scandal of the century. Since then I and my colleagues have
continued to report on these cases. I wish to reply to Dunn's
allegations about media reporting of the tragedy; I am, presumably, one
of those whom he pronounces guilty of "using a sustained stream of
biased, misleading, and often inaccurate information."1
According to Dunn, bereaved parents should direct their grief and anger over the death of their children towards people like me, rather than the surgeons who operated on the children and have since been found guilty of serious professional misconduct. "Shoot the messenger" is the age old response of those who dislike the message.
The Dispatches programme was researched
Read all Rapid Responses