Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Is welcome, but its recommendations are too cautious and vague
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Twenty years ago the secretary of state for social
services of the last Labour government appointed Sir Douglas Black to
chair a working group to review information on inequalities in health and suggest policy and research that should follow from this
review.1 The report appeared in 1980 and received a cold
reception from the new Conservative government.2 The
climate for the reception of the Black report's successor
the
independent inquiry into inequalities in health, chaired by Sir Donald
Acheson and published this week3
is hopefully different.
How do its findings and recommendations compare?
For 17 years of Conservative government the Labour party made political
capital out of the non-implementation of the recommendations of the
Black report. The announcement before the 1997 election that, if elected, Labour would commission an independent
review into inequalities in health was therefore welcome.4
When launching the inquiry in July 1997 the minister for public health
criticised the health strategy
Read all Rapid Responses