Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
In their editorial Maduma-Butshe et al discussed the need to
abandon the routine use of episiotomy in developing
countries.1
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
The use of episiotomy is a paradigmatic example of the many interventions that are introduced into clinical practice without scientific evidence and found after well performed research to be not only unjustified but also possibly harmful.2 In addition, once an intervention has been established in clinical practice it is not easily abandoned, even when strong scientific evidence shows its uselessness and harmfulness.
We have presented the results of our study on episiotomy3 and the reviews about it 2 4 many times, but clinicians have often remained sceptical and expressed little desire for change.
The table shows the trend in the use of episiotomy in one of the
hospitals where the Argentine episiotomy trial was performed (Maternidad Martin, Rosario, Argentina).3 Overall rates of episiotomy changed from 47.9% before the trial to 28.4%
Read all Rapid Responses