Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
The government's anti-drugs strategy places great
emphasis on reducing drug related crime.1 Part of its
concern is based on evidence of high drug use among offenders and the assumption that crime is driven by the need to finance drug use and may
be prevented if problem drug users are diverted into treatment. The
white paper reports that "latest indications from a random sample of
suspected offenders arrested by the police suggest that over 60% of
arrestees have traces of illegal drugs in their urine." It also
emphasises the importance of evidence and information in developing the
strategy.2 The notion that 60% of all arrested people
give urine samples that are positive for drugs has entered policy
debate as "evidence." But this evidence is based on shaky ground if
we examine the report from which it is derived.3
Urine testing was conducted in five police areas for different periods