Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Children affected by war must not be stigmatised as permanently damaged
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Southall and Abbasi quote Unicef when they state that the
psychological consequences of armed conflict on children are so great
that they can rarely be repaired.1 Unicef indeed says that
"time does not heal trauma," but there is no sound empirical basis
for a generalisation that risks stigmatising whole populations of
children affected by war as sick or permanently damaged. Even child
survivors of Auschwitz did not turn out like this as a general rule,
and there are no published studies of children from non-Western war
zones to support such a conlusion.
Unicef and other agencies need to review such claims and costly
interventions based on them; the claims owe more to prevailing sociocultural assumptions in the West than anything else. Over the past
50 years psychological explanations for life events and the
medicalisation of distress have grown hugely. Because many people
believe, for example, that rape or other