Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Peter M Dunn University of Bristol, Southmead
Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
Many colleagues, patients, and friends of James Wisheart, Janardin Dhasmana, and John Roylance will have been deeply shocked by the unjust way in which the three men have been treated. Every sympathy is due to those who have lost loved ones. However, whereas doctors will readily understand the aggressive grief that some parents have shown, their anger should surely be reserved for the news media (and their informants) that have misdirected this grief against the Bristol surgeons using a sustained stream of biased, misleading, and often inaccurate information. And the defendants' explanations remained almost entirely unreported after they presented their case.
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
| |
Finding the charges proved |
|---|
In June 1998 the professional conduct committee of the General
Medical Council announced that it had found the charges proved. But
what charges? Few appreciate that many of the original charges against
the surgeons, including those of clinical and technical incompetence,
had either been quietly dropped or were found not
Read all Rapid Responses