Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
M O Mathew Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Hospital for Sick
Children, Glasgow G3 8SJ
Correspondence to: Mr Bennet
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
Few data are published on the bruising seen in association
with paediatric fractures. What little can be found is set in the context of non-accidental injury. Differing opinions about the importance of bruising have been expressed by those working on medicolegal cases.1-3 The force necessary to fracture a
normal bone is thought to result invariably in external evidence of
trauma.1 The absence of such bruising has been taken to
imply that minimal force was required to produce the fracture
that is,
the fracture occurred because of metabolic bone disease or osteogenesis
imperfecta.
2 3
| |
Subjects, methods, and results |
|---|
We prospectively assessed 93 acute fractures in 88 normal
children (49 boys and 39 girls; age range 12 months to 13 years 11 months) at presentation and before definitive treatment, looking for
evidence of bruising around the fracture site. The prevalence of
bruising at initial presentation and its incidence during early follow
up was evaluated in subsets of fractures grouped according to
displacement and extent
Read all Rapid Responses