Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
New data should be used as a catalyst for change
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Being white, female, an academic high achiever, and singleminded can have its drawbacks, but when it comes to selection for United Kingdom medical schools, no one's better placed. At least that's the message from the analysis by McManus of the anonymised data on selection released this week (p 1111).1 The key findings show, surprisingly, that women are more likely to gain entry to medical schools, but candidates from ethnic minorities remain disadvantaged. Concerns about the selection procedure have long inspired calls for a code of practice.2
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
Differences exist between ethnic minority groups. Caribbeans are less
disadvantaged than Africans. Indians are less disadvantaged than
Bangladeshis or Pakistanis. While wide confidence intervals hint that
some of these differences may not be real, it is undeniable
and suspicions are confirmed
that overall ethnic minorities are
disadvantaged. Sceptics will argue that this analysis by McManus
doesn't take into account data on predicted A
Read all Rapid Responses