Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Study compared dressing techniques in selected group of patients
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Morrell et al conducted a randomised controlled trial assessing
the cost and clinical effectiveness of community leg ulcer
clinics.1 We are concerned that the trial design precludes a meaningful assessment of the value of these clinics.
Sixty five patients were excluded because they were unable to travel to
the clinic, and they did not undergo any formal assessment; these
patients still require a home visiting nursing service. It is
unreasonable to conclude that a clinic based service is more cost
effective when 16.5% of those requiring treatment were excluded from
the study owing to immobility. It would have been more valuable to
transport half of these patients to the clinic and include those
costings in the analysis. Treatment effectiveness would be better
assessed by comparing treatment with the Charing Cross bandaging
technique2 in the clinic with the same treatment in the
home. The patients treated at home received