Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Data do not justify study's conclusions
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Chapman has highlighted the confusion caused by the different
interpretations of the report by the International Agency for Research
on Cancer on the effects of passive smoking.1 By ignoring
the size and direction of the effect and focusing on the lower limit of
the confidence interval the agency came to the erroneous conclusion
that passive smoking does not cause lung cancer. Unfortunately, Fahey
et al have fallen into the same trap in reporting the results of a
systematic review of the use of antibiotics in acute
cough.2
They state categorically in their discussion: "This systematic review
shows that antibiotic treatment has no effect on the resolution of
acute cough." This conclusion is not justified by the data in their
review. Two of the outcomes measured
the resolution of productive
cough and clinical improvement
show a pooled effect that favours
antibiotics but does not reach significance at the 95%
Read all Rapid Responses