Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Trial is needed comparing decriminalisation of heroin with existing policy of prohibition
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Farrell and Hall seem to have misunderstood the importance of
the Swiss trials of heroin on prescription for addicts.1 The call for a clinical trial of heroin versus methadone is irrelevant as these drugs cater for different segments of the addict population; no one suggests stopping methadone clinics. It is self evident that
prescribing heroin will attract addicts who need the "buzz" and
will not switch to methadone. These include dealers and pushers and
those who succeed in obtaining funds through crime. Methadone clinics
attract newer rather than hard core addicts. A logical policy for
decriminalising heroin under medical supervision would have four steps:
giving prescriptions of heroin to all addicts in or out of prison
(which would gradually put criminals out of business); providing
methadone clinics for those who will switch; weaning the addicts off
the drugs; and providing a follow up programme to minimise relapse. The