Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
In his editorial Klein got it wrong: the figure of £21 billion
extra for the NHS in the United Kingdom over the next three years is an
example of the Labour government's new maths rather than its new
generosity.1 According to figures for England, for
example, next year the NHS will receive an extra £3.1 billion; the
year after, an extra £2.8 billion; and the year after that (2001-2),
£2.8 billion.
In conventional, if boring, accountancy, this adds up to an increase
over three years of £8.7 billion
not, as the Department of Health's
press release stated, £17.7 billion (the equivalent figure for the
British NHS is the much headlined £21 billion).2
The government has effectively counted next year's increase three
times, the second year's twice and the third year's once to arrive at
the inflated total. If the same accounting is applied to all the
increases the