Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Case arose through a failure of action, not of detection
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Smith refers to "key protagonists overreacting" in his
editorial on the Bristol case.1 He joins "even the
strongest supporters of the Labour government" in bemoaning "its
excessive concern with media opinion." Yet he tells us (and, from his
privileged platform, the world) that this case is a "once in a
lifetime drama..., Shakespearean in its scale and
structure," which will have the result that "the trust that
patients place in their doctors...will never be the
same again."
This is a strange stance for the editor of a scientific journal committed to encouraging rational ideas in medicine. Dramas like this (even dramas that occur more often than once in a lifetime) are certainly "powerful levers for change." But that is not a reason for senior medical journals to seize on them and use them to promote pre-existing agendas of change that have only a tangential bearing.
The lesson of
Read all Rapid Responses