Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
In their editorial Chaudhuri and Clough advocate a greater use
of subcutaneous apomorphine in patients with Parkinson's disease and
point out that a prefilled variable dose pen injector has recently
become available.1 My local pharmacist informed me of the
increase in cost when a patient is switched to the use of these pens.
My patient's dose of apomorphine supplied in conventional vials costs
£1200 per month; the same dose supplied in injector pens costs £3225
a month. I telephoned the manufacturer, Britannia Pharmaceuticals, to
find out if there had been some mistake in the pricing structure. I was
told that the difference in price was correct and justified as the
company was hoping to recoup the costs incurred in developing the pen
injection system. This is surprising given that the technology has
already been well developed for insulin, at an increase of only 50%
over the cost of