BMJ 1998;317:599 ( 29 August )

Letters

Breast cancer screening: false positive rate is lower in older women

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Werneke and McPherson1 question the detection rates of cancer observed in the breast screening programme in East Sussex, Brighton, and Hove that we reported in our recent paper.2 They suggest that these are the result of a high proportion of false positive screens. It is unfortunate that they did not consult us beforehand. The paper gives results of an ongoing study, but the cancers reported are those confirmed by histological examination after surgery, not preliminary suspected cancers at "positive" screens. The statistical programme was not run until some months after the end of the screening period, when all the screening episodes had been completed and the women concerned had been assessed, diagnosed, and operated on as appropriate.

The East Sussex area has always tended to have a high detection rate for cancer, possibly because of the local sociodemographic composition of the population, and the rate over this period . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Extending the benefits of breast cancer screening
Ursula Werneke and Klim McPherson
BMJ 1998 317: 360-361. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Van Houdenhove, B., Verheyen, L., Pardaens, K., Luyten, P., Van Wambeke, P. (2007). Rehabilitation of decreased motor performance in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: should we treat low effort capacity or reduced effort tolerance?. Clin Rehabil 21: 1121-1142 [Abstract]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ