Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Christopher Hamlin a Department of History, University of
Notre Dame, 219 O'Shaughnessy Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556-0368, USA, b Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool,
Liverpool L69 3BX
Correspondence to: Professor Hamlin
Christopher.S.Hamlin.1@nd.edu
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
This autumn marks the 150th anniversary of the Public Health Act for England and Wales, the beginning of a commitment to proactive, rather than a reactive, public health. The act began a series of legislative measures extending through the Victorian era and into this century in which the state became guarantor of standards of health and environmental quality and provided means for local units of government to make the structural changes to meet those standards.
That public action can substantially improve the health of the
general population now seems obvious, and it also seems obvious that
public authorities owe their citizens that improvement. Both were
controversial in the 1830s and 1840s. For centuries European governments had reacted to epidemics with decrees. With medical boards
to advise them, they set their military forces to protecting borders
and ports, whitewashed towns, fumigated dwellings, and burnt bedding.
The threat of unusual disease prompted