Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
In 1995 Charache et al showed conclusively in the United States
that hydroxyurea ameliorates the clinical consequences of sickle cell
disease in most patients.1 There is no biological reason
to expect greatly different results in Britain. Moreover, there has not
been any serious discussion at any meetings of European or North
American experts that has been in support of repeating the study. Doing
so is not warranted from either the research or cost perspectives.
We were therefore surprised to read the editorial by Olujohungbe et al
on hydroxyurea treatment for sickle cell disease in Britain.2 Many reasons are cited for low patient
recruitment into trials which necessarily will be aggravated in patient
groups who may already consider themselves misunderstood by
society,3 as is reported in sickle cell disease. In a
pilot study of combination treatment with hydroxyurea and a short chain
fatty acid, sodium valproate, we were able to
Read all Rapid Responses