Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Study adds nothing to knowledge of processes of tissue injury induced by silicone
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
In a study that was five years old at publication Nyrén et al
claim to show "no evidence of association between breast implants and
connective tissue disease," using classical rheumatic diseases as end
points.1 This report is less comprehensive than that by
Gabriel et al, although comparable in scope and shortcomings of
definitions.2 It lacks data on rupture (the prevalence
rises with time3); rupture enhances the reaction to gel
filled devices.4 Gabriel et al estimated the minimum
population necessary for risk assessment to be 62 000 subjects with
implants and 124 000 controls.2
Table 3 is confusing because the observed numbers of cases are compared
with the expected numbers, derived from the standardised hospitalisation ratios. The data can mean only that in Sweden the rate
of admission to hospital for rheumatic disease is the same whether a
patient has silicone implants or not. Few patients go to hospital for
rheumatic