Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
In his review on advances in the understanding of faecal
incontinence Kamm focused on structural damage as an aetiological
factor and surgical intervention as a treatment.1 A review
of epidemiological evidence suggests that this focus is misplaced for
several reasons.
Kamm states that the prevalence of faecal incontinence is 2% in the
adult population and 7% in healthy independent adults aged over 65. These figures probably relate to anal incontinence (loss of gas or
mucous as well as solid or liquid faeces) rather than just faecal
incontinence and to episodic rather than frequent (daily or weekly)
incontinence.2 These figures may therefore overestimate
the level of need in a community population. The literature suggests
that faecal incontinence occurs on a weekly to monthly basis in less
than 1% of the population aged under 65.
2 3
Faecal
incontinence, however, is closely associated with age (prevalence about
15% in adults aged
85 living