Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Randomisation doesn't guarantee similarity of groups; minimisation does
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
When we have to decide which of two drugs, interventions, or management strategies is the better, the most secure evidence is generally obtained from a randomised controlled trial. The primary objective of randomisation is to ensure that all other factors that might influence the outcome will be equally represented in the two groups, leaving the treatment under test as the only dissimilarity. Any difference in outcome can then be attributed to the treatment effect. But how realistic is this assumption in practice?
When published a randomised trial typically includes a table listing
all the prior factors known actually or possibly to influence outcome.
The average age and its distribution in each group and the proportion
of men and women usually head the list, followed by other likely
determinants of outcome. In the case of heart disease these will
probably include details of left ventricular function; the proportions
in each group
Read all Rapid Responses