Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Transparency is the key
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Conflict of interest is being taken more seriously
by doctors and by society at large. The New England Journal of
Medicine has twice recently been heavily criticised for failing
to declare authors' conflicts of interest
despite its declared policy
of doing so.
1 2
Last week the BBC halted a £360 000,
well reviewed television series because of a "potential conflict of
interest": the producer owned commercial property featured in the
series.3 Despite the rising concern, medical journals have
done an indifferent job in tackling the problem.4 Four
years ago I wrote an editorial arguing that we had to do
better,5 and we began then to require all authors to sign
forms declaring conflicts of interest. Unfortunately authors often fail
to declare conflicts of interest. This issue of the BMJ
contains a collection of material on the subject, and we are proposing
new policies.
A common problem
Conflict of interest has been defined
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+