BMJ 1998;317:277 ( 25 July )

Letters

Fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid solutions

    Comparing different studies is difficult
    Newer synthetic colloids should not be abandoned
    One conclusion could be that hypertonic saline is better than colloids in trauma
    Eight studies should have been excluded
    Use of dextran-70 for fluid resuscitation has been dying out
    Conditions and patient groups were too heterogeneous to allow meaningful comparisons
    Authors' reply
    Virtually identical article had appeared in Cochrane Library

Comparing different studies is difficult

Editorial by Offringa and Paper p 235

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITORThe debate over giving crystalloids or colloids has been raging since the 19th century, when Cohnheim and Lichtheim found gastric mucosal oedema in patients who had been resuscitated with saline and Starling suggested that albumin could prevent oedema. ^{1 2} The meta-analysis by Schierhout and Roberts, which does not support the continued use of colloids for volume replacement in critically ill patients, makes a useful contribution to this debate but does not settle it.³

A recent review by Hankeln and Beez comes to the opposite conclusionthat colloids are more effective than crystalloids for optimising physiological variables related to flow in critically ill patients and maintaining the delivery of oxygen to the tissues²; they say that this is related to the persistence of colloids in the circulating plasma volume, as opposed to their distribution throughout the total body water.⁴ Although colloids are more expensive than crystalloids, their effect on . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Crystalloid, colloid, albumin?
BMJ 1998 317: 0. [Full Text]

Excess mortality after human albumin administration in critically ill patients

Martin Offringa
BMJ 1998 317: 223-224. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Human albumin administration in critically ill patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials • Why albumin may not work

Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers and Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers
BMJ 1998 317: 235-240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid solutions in critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised trials

Gill Schierhout and Ian Roberts
BMJ 1998 316: 961-964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Gosling, P (2003). Salt of the earth or a drop in the ocean? A pathophysiological approach to fluid resuscitation. Emerg. Med. J. 20: 306-315 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Revell, M, Porter, K, Greaves, I (2002). Fluid resuscitation in prehospital trauma care: a consensus view. Emerg. Med. J. 19: 494-498 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Amini, S., Gabrielli, A., Caruso, L. J., Layon, A. J. (2002). The Thoracic Surgical Patient: Initial Postoperative Care. SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 6: 169-188 [Abstract]  
• Revell, M., Porter, K., Greaves, I. (2002). Fluid resuscitation in pre-hospital trauma care: a consensus view. Trauma 4: 21-28 [Abstract]  
• McClelland, B. (1998). Albumin: don't confuse us with the facts. BMJ 317: 829-830 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Mortality is the wrong end-point

A R Webb
bmj.com, 24 Jul 1998 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>