Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Both Richards's editorial on continuing medical
education1 and Towle's article on changes in health care
and continuing medical education for the 21st century2
emphasised the importance of self directed learning.
1 2
This can occur only when learners feel confident, supported, and self
motivated. Our experience in south London has shown that personal
development plans motivate and change clinical practice. Practice
development plans share the same strengths by responding to perceived
need and allowing evaluation of outcomes. Joining with groups of
practitioners (some have been meeting regularly for up to 20 years)
avoids isolation and provides personal support and help with personal
development.
The proposed changes in continuing medical education and professional
development cannot be introduced, maintained, or developed without
corresponding changes to fiscal and administrative structures. The
challenge for medical politicians is to negotiate a structure for
primary care education at all levels that is controlled by primary care
and