Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Discrimination is probably indirect
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Esmail et al attribute disparity between white and non-white
award holders to discrimination.1 Existence of direct
discrimination in some spheres of the NHS does not imply it also
affects distinction awards. The regional and central advisory
committees on distinction awards are beyond reproach. Rubin's
suggestion that several other factors may explain the skewed
distributions is more plausible.2 Disparity between groups
of consultants is inevitable because of differences in abilities,
training, and opportunities.
The Commission for Racial Equality held that the criteria laid down for
distinction awards could, however, result in indirect discrimination,
not necessarily with discriminatory intent. For example, the weight
given to work of national and international significance may make the
awards less accessible to those in smaller district general hospitals
or specialties, where ethnic minority consultants may be concentrated.
The Department of Health has therefore issued criteria placing less
emphasis on national and international recognition and