Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Cardiac surgery: the fall guy in medical quality assurance
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The General Medical Council has recently been grappling with the problem of measuring and comparing surgical outcomes after complex surgery in a heterogeneous patient population with differing severities of illness.1 Cardiothoracic surgery, with its immediate, and sometimes catastrophic outcomes, is the first surgical specialty to come under such scrutiny. Inevitably the media coverage has dented public confidence in the ability of the medical profession to police itself, and in particular this has been focused on cardiothoracic surgery.1 Yet, the irony is that in the United Kingdom cardiothoracic surgery has better data and is more subject to internal scrutiny than perhaps any other specialty.
The Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons has a long history of audit. In
1977 Sir Terence English established the United Kingdom cardiac
surgical register,2 which collects activity and mortality
data on all cardiac surgical procedures performed in each NHS cardiac
surgical unit, amounting to 35 000 procedures a year. Although
Read all Rapid Responses