Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Jan Poloniecki Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical
School, London SW17 0RE
j.poloniecki@sghms.ac.uk
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
A heart operation can put a very ill patient on the road to a long and healthy life, or it can kill the patient. Major surgery is just one of many instances when treatment can result in a failure more serious than the consequences of doing nothing. The balance of risk requires a responsible attitude from all the many parties to an operation: the patient, the general practitioner, the specialist physician, the surgeon, theatre nurses, and the anaesthetist; supervisors, such as the chief medical officer and chief executive of the hospital; and the funders of the operation.
This article considers the advantages of having an authoritative estimate of the current failure rate for an operation and reflects on the problems that have arisen where there was a lack of interest in doing this.
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
| |
What are my chances, Doc-as a percentage, please? |
|---|
A numerical estimate of the failure rate is a number, not a
statement like "The operation is