News

Call for research misconduct agency

Caroline White, London

The UK needs an independent agency to monitor standards in publication ethics and prevent the growing problem of research misconduct. This is one of the principal recommendations of The COPE Report 1998, published this week by the Committee on Publication Ethics.

Since its inception in April 1997, the committee has received a steady stream of examples of research fraud, data fabrications, plagiarism, and redundant publication. A substantial number of these are published in the report as anonymised case studies. There are no official data on the scale of the problem, but the report suggests that only a comparatively small proportion of cases is actually detected: it is estimated that redundant publication accounts for 13% of all published papers.

The UK has been very slow to act to regulate research affairs, says Professor Michael Farthing, editor of the gastroenterology journal Gut and chairman of . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

The dark side of medicine
BMJ 1998 316: 0. [Full Text]

The need for a national body for research misconduct

Richard Smith
BMJ 1998 316: 1686-1687. [Extract] [Full Text]

Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom • An American perspective on research integrity • Conduct unbecomingthe MRC's approach • An editor's response to fraudsters • Deception: difficulties and initiatives • Honest advice from Denmark

Drummond Rennie, Imogen Evans, Michael J G Farthing, Cyril Chantler, Shireen Chantler, and Povl Riis
BMJ 1998 316: 1726-1733. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]