Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Mini-mental state examination may not test cognitive function adequately
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Gussekloo et al hypothesised that mild cognitive impairment as
determined by the Dutch version of the mini-mental state examination
discriminates subjects with a higher risk of mortality.1
We have concerns about the validity of using the mini-mental state examination as an adequate test of cognitive function. We have doubts about the reproducibility of test scores if the test is administered by different physicians. In clinical practice the mini-mental state examination is well recognised as being a useful guide rather than an absolute measure of cognitive function; it is a subjective test with variable results.
In particular, we think that defining the scores for mild cognitive impairment and normal cognitive function so close together, at 24-27 and 28-30 respectively, is a potential source of bias. A subject could fall into either category, depending on several variables affecting alertness, such as time of day, timing of drug treatment, stress, and discomfort.
The