Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
How hospitals manage emergency admissions needs to be examined
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Smith was right to suggest that the debate on the NHS should
shift to something more important than waiting lists.1 Waiting lists are used by politicians as an indicator of the success or
failure of the health service, yet they are merely a measure of how
much we as a society wish to spend on the health service. What should
be exercising our minds is the ability of hospitals to manage emergency
admissions other than those politically important ones occurring over
the winter as a result of inclement weather. In 1984 it was recognised
that over half of all surgical admissions were
emergencies,2 and this has not changed; yet patients
admitted as a surgical emergency receive a poor service. At worst they may be operated on at inappropriate times by inappropriate surgeons, although we know this is wrong. Alternatively, they may wait for days
for expert opinion or investigation