Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Commissioners of health care have to decide which of the many
possible uses of resources should be given priority, given that we
cannot afford everything that might do some good for some people. One
way of comparing possible investments is to consider cost per life year
gained. Extending life from 3 months to 9 months at a cost of £4000
costs the same per life year gained as extending life by 5 years at a
cost of £40 000
namely, £8000. Let's leave quality of life, and
comparisons of the benefits of mortality and morbidity aside for the
time being.
Our problem is this: should 6 months of life, when that is most of what
is left, be valued equally with 6 months that is part of a much longer
survival period, or should it be valued as part of the progression to
complete recovery? Should the time that is left weigh more heavily
Read all Rapid Responses