BMJ 1998;316:1244 ( 18 April )

Letters

Management of Helicobacter pylori infection

    Eradication treatment should be limited to patients with proved peptic ulceration
    Authors' reply

Eradication treatment should be limited to patients with proved peptic ulceration

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Benefits from treating Helicobacter pylori infection may depend less on the choice of eradication regimen than on the selection of patients to be treated. Rauws and van der Hulst make sound recommendations for the former at the expense of misleading on the latter.1 Their advice to general practitioners to test and prescribe eradication treatment in dyspeptic patients aged under 45 reflects that of the European Helicobacter Study Group2; neither set of recommendations is evidence based.

Both sets of recommendations advocate the safety net of specialist referral when eradication has failed in primary care. This ignores the reality that fewer than one quarter of dyspeptic patients with H pylori infection have peptic ulcer disease and that only this group of patients can be confidently expected to benefit from eradication treatment.3 Treating all dyspeptic patients infected with H pylori would therefore result in most of those with non-ulcer dyspepsia or . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

The management of H pylori infection
E A J Rauws and R W M van der Hulst
BMJ 1998 316: 162-163. [Extract] [Full Text]

Challenges in managing dyspepsia in general practice
Lars Agréus and Nicholas Talley
BMJ 1997 315: 1284-1288. [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ