Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Eradication treatment should be limited to patients with proved peptic ulceration
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Benefits from treating Helicobacter pylori
infection may depend less on the choice of eradication regimen
than on the selection of patients to be treated. Rauws and van der
Hulst make sound recommendations for the former at the expense of
misleading on the latter.1 Their advice to general
practitioners to test and prescribe eradication treatment in dyspeptic
patients aged under 45 reflects that of the European Helicobacter Study
Group2; neither set of recommendations is evidence based.
Both sets of recommendations advocate the safety net of
specialist referral when eradication has failed in primary care. This ignores the reality that fewer than one quarter of dyspeptic patients with H pylori infection have peptic ulcer disease and
that only this group of patients can be confidently expected to benefit from eradication treatment.3 Treating all dyspeptic
patients infected with H pylori would therefore result
in most of those with non-ulcer dyspepsia or